Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 07:35:20 UTC

E.10:2 - Problem

  1. Polysemy drift. Process, function, service, agent, activity slide between structure, recipe, execution, and promise.
  2. Cross-local collision. A label such as Owner is assumed to have one global meaning even though distinct sources, practices, or schemes use it differently.
  3. Name-bloat and parochialism tension. Either hyper-specific domain names leak into core kinds, or vague umbrella names obscure invariants.
  4. EntityOfConcern and Description-episteme boundary and specification-use collapse. Authors mix EntityOfConcern (the thing under concern), Description episteme (how we describe it), and specification use (testable criteria, formality, acceptance, and harness-gated use of a Description episteme).
  5. Register soup. Tech terms bleed into Plain pedagogy and vice‑versa, inviting category errors.