Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 14:36:52 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 14:38:14 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 15:35:10 UTC

E.11.PUA:4.1 - The ordinary seven-step use

Before making any pattern-use record, answer aloud: “What exactly do I have now, what is the smallest useful result, and what would make me stop or return?”

  1. Recognize the working situation. Name the subject or relation in ordinary domain language and ask the current practical question. State an exact kind now only when a nearby kind difference can change the pattern or result.

  2. Inspect one direct pattern. Read its Problem frame, Problem, Forces, Solution, Consequences, ordinary boundary, and nearest stronger neighbor. Do not select from its title or one trigger word alone.

  3. Say what useful result would answer the question. Name the entity, obtaining relation, honest interim entity, or blocker plainly enough to distinguish it from a plan, description, recommendation, work occurrence, or nearby value. Name the Method, plan, dated Work, Transformation, evaluation, decision, or later-use object relative to which it is a result only when the phrase depends on that object. Add an exact kind, predicate, pattern locator, ClaimGraph, or category-correct basis only when ambiguity or replay makes it necessary.

  4. Use the pattern’s Solution. A person or assisting system follows the guidance under its stated conditions. Name a system-role classification or assignment only when that claim matters; it necessarily matters for a precise Agent or actual-Work performer claim because A.13 requires both in the performer core. If actual Work is current, first recover every precise performer’s A.13 core; A.15.1 then independently admits the dated Work from the exact performance history, enacted Method, extent, and containing-System relation. Add F.6 afterward only when this use needs precise assignment-bound attribution through the same obtaining A.13 assignment; otherwise the Work-only account stops after A.15.1. Identify a Method, authority, responsibility, or another independent value only when its own claim is current. A responsibility claim names its predicate and participants, or the A.6.RCD missing governor; routine pattern use needs no such expansion. Use A.15.PROD when the current claim must settle whole or proper-part production Work, Work-attributed first existence, or production completion; apply only the branch that answers that claim.

  5. Check what now exists or obtains. Identify the result under the direct pattern whose content defines, constrains, or tests it. A pre-existing entity may instead receive new grounding for the current question. If the expected subject result still does not exist, name the honest interim result and leave the subject expectation open. Do not turn grounding, planning, evaluation, acceptance, publication, or non-agentive change into production. Compare the obtained result with the original receiving use, not only with the selected pattern’s expected output. At an existing demonstration or handover, inspect what the result now enables and any extra adjustment needed to make it usable. If the account leaves a consequential difference unexplained, B.5.PI helps form the inquiry; the user need not already know an anomaly label or another PatternID. A reported concern is not closed by a correct answer to a substitute question. B.5.EA helps recover what the formulation lost. Use the available episode and text before asking the participant to supply a diagnosis. An adequate direct result still finishes this use without an extra audit.

  6. State the immediate continuation only as needed. Name a later use, stronger neighboring pattern, or unresolved clarification in conversation. Materialize an expectation, basis, result, flow, provenance, or boundary episteme only when a named later use needs it to remain addressable.

  7. Stop or return. Stop when the smallest useful result, honest interim entity, or exact blocker answers the current question at the precision that use needs. Return when the concern, basis, expected entity, direct pattern, relation, or later-use condition changes. A genuine stop needs no receiver.

The practical delta has three honest forms. A new entity or relation occurrence becomes current under its own rule and basis; use the applicable A.15.PROD branch only when a production-work, Work-attributed first-constitution or completion claim is current. A pre-existing entity remains unchanged while a grounding finding becomes adequate for this use. Or the expected subject result remains absent while an honest interim result and return condition become explicit.