E.11:5.2 - A later safety review needs comparison history

The receiving safety review relies on an addressable rationale for why a team compared the ordinary MATHEMATICAL-MODELING entry, OPTION-COMPARISON, and SYSTEM-DELIMITATION with the ordinary SYSTEM-RECOGNITION entry before a hazardous test. New measurements will later reopen the choice. The four examples ask different first questions: what a model can support, which comparison or readiness result is needed, which parts or crossings matter, and whether the exact entity must be treated as a System at all.

That named reliance admits a PracticalUseEntryComparisonAccount@Context with four comparison rows, the stop boundary, and the return condition. The account does not authorize the test or replace evidence, assurance, gate, choice, or WorkPlan relations.