fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 94226–94236

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 07:35:20 UTC

E.17.1:20 - Review Matrix and Catalogue Maintenance

A reviewer can test a viewpoint bundle library with five questions:

  1. Do the member viewpoints still have explicit standalone meaning?
  2. Does the local declaration and its family designator describe one coherent recurring family rather than one convenience list?
  3. If a subset is imported, is the omitted remainder still visible as omission rather than silent deletion?
  4. If several bundles interact, is exact provenance preserved without being called correspondence, and does any actual comparison follow the correct same-scheme or F.9 cross-context branch?
  5. Has a publication face started impersonating the library itself?

Prefer small, provenance-preserving declarations inside exact editioned catalogues over lexical mega-families that are easy to name but hard to reuse truthfully.