E.17.2:4.4 - Recognize holon-centered TEVB views by conformance
TEVB keeps two subjects explicit:
| Episteme | Exact EntityOfConcern | Job |
|---|---|---|
| viewpoint episteme P | exact admitted target kind in the self-contained branch; exact selected viewpoint-convention structure S only in a triggered structured branch | states the target-kind criterion, concerns, admitted episteme kinds, semantic-form, coverage, consistency, completeness, omission, and describing-use rules |
| candidate or view episteme E | one exact holon H admitted by P’s target criterion | states claims about H; whenever it relates H to another engineering object, it names the exact predicate, participants, and obtaining test |
EpistemeViewpointConformanceRelation(E,P) must obtain under the fixed E.17.0 predicate. Only then is the same episteme E a U.View. Direct authoring, query execution, A.6.3 construction, a reader-facing label, declaration membership, or publication does not establish that membership. A reader-facing system-role label also establishes neither the local kind nor a C.3.2 classification judgment or assignment.
For one current describing use, its exact use qualification carries one singular viewpointRef : U.ViewpointRef resolving P under the effective reference scheme. Any reader-facing viewpoint name is only P’s ordinary designator. The use qualification, designator, reference, and P remain distinct; selection identifies neither E nor H, establishes no conformance, and adds no conformance participant or episteme-identity field.
Recover exact H only as EntityOfConcern(E) from E’s C.2.1 constitution. Do not import a legacy context tuple, generic bounded-context object, or model-use identity field into E, P, S, conformance, or selection. Another use may select another P while E remains unchanged; several selected viewpoints require an exact C.13 collection of their references rather than one overloaded reference.
If a user needs a view whose exact subject is a Method, local system-role kind, system-role assignment, transformation, responsibility relation, or structure rather than H, identify another candidate episteme with that EntityOfConcern and use a viewpoint whose target-kind criterion admits it. Do not silently retarget a holon-centered TEVB view.