E.17.2:5.2.2 - Safety-triggered recovery use

Suppose a second claim says that restarting H after the same jam is safe for an exposed operator, and a named restart decision relies on that proposition. The project now identifies the exact safety-analysis episteme and its hazard, guard, and recovery claims; relates the relied-on evidence through A.10; and uses B.3 only when an actual named assurance claim for the restart use is current. If the applicable safety rule or restart decision requires assurance, state that claim, its exact target, and its named use before applying B.3. The operational method, state transitions, and flow relations remain the same exact operational basis; safety analysis and reliance are added because this claim and decision trigger them, not because every failure or recovery description requires assurance.