E.17.AUD.LHR:3.2 - Ordinary working card
Use this five-row card for ordinary cases:
| Row | Ordinary prompt |
|---|---|
| 1 | Which trigger word is carrying unresolved semantic load? |
| 2 | What lexical-head kind is it honestly naming here? |
| 3 | Which local reading is actually primary here? |
| 4 | What active primary entity or relation, carried action or question under repair, and outside work are actually in play here? |
| 5 | After one honest repair, is local restoration enough, or does another governing FPF pattern or project-side FPF kind and reference named by value now govern the case? |
Treat that card as the recognition block. It is a local repair aid, not a universal sequence rail. Use it while one overloaded local lexical head remains the main defect.
When family or governing-pattern language is load-bearing, add one explicit conditional output line next to the card: repair disposition = ... | governing pattern = ... | primary entity/relation = ... | move = ... | outside work = ....
Read the card as a three-way recovery aid:
- if rows 1-5 stabilize around one repaired local lexical head, one restored local work position, one active primary entity or relation, and one honest local question, stay here;
- if rows 1-5 stabilize locally and the remaining question is one bounded comparative review move over already pinned source epistemes or publications, apply
E.17.ID.CRrather than thickening this local lexical-head repair pattern; - if rows 2-5 still cannot stay stable because the same publication unit keeps borrowing a different object, move, or outside-work boundary from the same local lexical head, apply
E.17.AUD.OOTDinstead of pretending one more qualifier will rescue the same unit.
The nearest worked slices for those three repair dispositions are:
- ordinary stay-local:
E.17.AUD.LHR:5.2; - admissible bounded-comparison disposition:
E.17.AUD.LHR:5.4; - admissible application of whole-unit discipline:
E.17.AUD.LHR:5.5.