E.17.AUD.OOTD:3 - Forces

Force	Tension
Local repair vs publication-unit stability	The pattern must not replace local precision repair, but it must become available when local repair no longer stabilizes the unit.
Primary-subject clarity vs surrounding-work convenience	The unit must keep one primary subject without forcing the whole surrounding work process into the same text.
Interpretation clarity vs overgrowth	The section must distinguish primary subject, exact `EntityOfConcern` when applicable, concern, carried move, downstream use, publication form, carrier, and process without turning into a giant ontology lecture.
Plain entry vs later assurance	The opening must stay light enough for ordinary use while preserving the distinctions needed if a concrete neighboring claim or assurance question later arises.
Publication-unit stability vs architecture replacement	The pattern must not replace view, face, carrier, publication, or moving-lineage architecture.