E.17.EFP:4.1.b - How to read this profile
This profile does not decide whether a claim is true or which claim-bearing object exists. It starts after C.2.1 identity and any required source-to-target relation are recoverable, then qualifies the explanation use of one publication form or representation.
Faithfulnessnames the review question for that explanation use, not a pass verdict or an episteme-identity rule.- Class names are bounded-use labels for a form or representation, not merit labels and not source-to-target relations.
- Use E.17 for face discipline and E.24.PUB for publication occurrence and form.
- A changed assertion, concern or effective scheme reopens episteme identity even when the prose remains explanatory, didactic, reconstructive or speculative. Selecting only enough source content for a bounded use does not itself assert a changed ClaimGraph.
- A causal or counterfactual addition requires a separate hypothesis episteme under B.5.2 before any publication form can receive an EFP use label.