fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 95807–95817

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 14:36:52 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 14:38:14 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 14:50:08 UTC

E.17.EFP:4.6 - Hard boundary rules

A rendering reviewed under this profile keeps the following explicit:

  • it does not create a second face family;
  • it does not turn faces into a second semantic rule track;
  • it does not license new A.6.B boundary claims on explanation faces: law claims, use-boundary claims, deontic or commitment claims, and effect or evidence claims;
  • it does not replace bridge discipline, retargeting discipline, or world or gate boundary discipline;
  • it does not let publication face/form and interop publication form collapse into one undifferentiated explanation channel.

If explanation text carries a changed ClaimGraph, stop class review, identify the exact target episteme and establish that the direct source-to-target relation obtains. Resume EFP only for a publication form of that target when bounded explanation use remains separately material.