E.17.EFP:5.4.a - Anti-example: explanation that quietly becomes a new claim

Source episteme claim. The reserve path remained available during the observed short overload interval.

Overreaching text. The reserve-path design is robust against short overloads.

The second sentence has a different ClaimGraph. To retain it, constitute an exact target episteme under C.2.1, identify an obtaining source-to-target relation, and establish the wider design-robustness claim under its applicable pattern. Until that relation obtains and the wider claim is established, the sentence is unsupported and receives no EFP class; reopening the source or calling the text face-local does not make the claim part of the source edition.