E.17.ID.CR:4.3.g - Representation ontology and modeling lens (informative)
The early canonical lens for this pattern is already stated near the top: one comparative review unit over already available, source-pinned epistemes or source-pinned publications, with the shared review frame preserved, one bounded contrast or small row set made visible, and blocked downstream claim or effect kept outside.
This pattern does not model interpretation in general.
It models one comparative review unit governed by ComparativeReviewUnit within the broader InterpretationDiscipline family.
In plain terms, the pattern works over the review unit itself.
That unit can appear as a comparison note, comparison sheet, or guided review aid, but it is not the whole review process or the source system.
The bounded comparison is the interpretive lift carried by that review unit.
The minimum typed lens is a compact record of:
- source references and source relation;
- one declared source-relation class;
- one declared comparison criterion and added-claim policy;
- one bounded-use boundary, one overread-risk line, and one
worldContactPolicythat remains subordinate to the pattern governing a gate or adjudication claim;A.21governs a named gate decision under its applicable profile, whileA.20applies only to a named internal-constraint check in a transformation-flow case; - the relevant prompt, ontology, and authority boundary triggers;
- and which neighboring pattern still governs the base case when this remains a mixed overlay.
The lens keeps the main read tied to the review unit and the problem-owning review domain, while leaving source, continuity, and boundary discipline under whichever neighboring pattern still governs the base case.