Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 14:36:52 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 14:38:14 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 15:30:10 UTC

E.18.1:12 - Relations

  • Apply A.22.CGUS when P2W identifies one A.22 structure whose local loci, selected relations, applied constraints, and at least two potential continuations are recoverable. Judge enabled, disabled, unknown, and error outcomes for the present case separately from structure identity and membership.

  • E.18.3 qualifies that exact A.22-selected CGUS through positions, bindings, and already-obtaining occurrences from one independently identified E.18 substrate. E.18 defines the one-TFS and parent-relative internal-SubflowRef interfaces; E.18.NET defines independently identified network members and exact obtaining cross-member relations. P2W cites those exact values, adds no subset, reciprocal record, or hybrid structure schema, and neither reidentifies nor routes them.

  • G.2 supplies SoTA harvesting, source selection, competing-tradition synthesis, and the refreshable synthesis pack before DPF hardening can rely on a source-derived seed. Add A.10 for claim-bound source or provenance, G.6 for addressable path citation or shared provenance representation, B.3 for assurance of a named reliance use, and G.11 for currentness and refresh only when that stronger use is current.

  • E.4.DPF guides DPF authoring. When the framework-architecture question is live, E.9 records the selected answer and E.4.PFAD profiles its framework-specific content; E.4.PFR handles an optional framework-relation record only when a named maintenance use needs one.

  • E.23 defines and tests repeated quality improvement only after the object version and evaluation are recoverable; P2W may carry a seed to that point but does not become the improvement method.

  • G.11 defines and tests currentness, admitted-source decay, source-use relation change, edition change, and refresh when a changed source publication, source-use relation, or telemetry reopens the smallest affected P2W application.

  • E.18 defines and tests the selected TransformationFlowStructure, its internal transfer, flow valuation, positions, crossings and local state bindings. Apply A.20 for a current internal constraint-validity claim and A.21 for a current gate profile application, check mapping or gate decision; cite those separate results only when the P2W continuation uses them.

  • C.22.2 defines and tests the accepted problem-side record and problem-side claims related to the carried distinction.

  • A.6.P supplies recovery and readable statement of each direct relation. A.6.REL defines and tests direct obtaining, occurrence individuation, and receiver-conditioned use of any reusable RelationSignature; P2W cites the occurrence, assertion or description returned there and copies none of that doctrine into ClaimContent. Use A.6.RCD, E.24, and E.24.UK for any later P2W relation-kind candidate and admission, while A.6.0 declares a RelationSignature only after that settlement. F.8/F.18/F.17 open only when an external naming or publication use is current; the header’s Tech/Plain pattern label and local note-field phrases create no NameCard, term row, U-kind, relation or MethodDescription.

Canonical question-to-pattern map. Read each row independently. The row order is not a declaration or work sequence, and each pattern keeps the definition, test, and basis of the result it returns.

Current object or questionPattern to apply; P2W keeps only its result or stop
Mathematical-lens use; FormalSubstrate or PrincipleFrame declaration; ontology or admissionMathematical-lens use -> C.29; profile-specific signature declaration -> A.6.0; residual relation-kind settlement -> A.6.RCD; admission of the settled candidate -> E.24 or E.24.UK. These are separate questions.
UTS publication; semantic Bridge; characteristic space; measurement; subject-specific evaluation; normalization; comparison; parityUTS publication -> F.17; Bridge -> F.9; characteristic-space construction -> A.19; measurement -> C.16; evaluation -> the pattern that defines the subject-specific criterion and test; normalization -> A.19.UNM; comparison -> A.19.CPM; parity -> G.9. A measurement or evidence result is not an evaluation, permission, readiness, gate, or decision result.
Mechanism; mechanism-method stabilization; methodMechanism declaration -> A.6.1; stabilization of its method connection -> E.20; reusable way of doing -> A.3.1.
Transformation; temporal aspect; temporal-claim adequacy; dynamicsActual bounded transformation -> A.3.4; temporal aspect -> C.27.TA; adequacy of a temporal claim for use -> C.27; dynamics episteme -> A.3.3.
Archive or front; retained exploration value; live pool; selector; parity; selected-set declaration; publicationArchive or front -> C.18; still-live pool -> C.19; selector -> A.19.SelectorMechanism; parity -> G.9; selected-set declaration -> G.5; source-backed publication face -> E.17; publication occurrence, form, carrier, audience, bounded use, and availability -> E.24.PUB. A pool, selected set, and publication are different results.
Alignment; dated Work; planning; planned filling; appearance-based reliance; work-entry readiness; work-to-change; production; unresolved result wordingAlignment -> A.15; Work -> A.15.1; planning -> A.15.2; planned filling -> A.15.3; reliance repair -> A.15.4; readiness -> A.15.5; work-to-change -> its named subject predicate or the applicable A.6.RCD route; production -> A.15.PROD; unresolved result, input, or handoff wording -> A.6.P.WMR. P2W cites the returned claim or blocker rather than repeating its proof.
Generator autonomy; evidence; assurance; provenanceGenerator autonomy -> E.16; evidence -> A.10; assurance for a named reliance -> B.3; provenance -> G.6. An autonomy declaration supplies none of evidence, assurance, permission, or performed Work.
Acceptance record, label, or claimed acceptanceName the exact acceptance question and apply the pattern that defines or tests its predicate. Carry its result or blocker. A record or label does not establish acceptance, and C.25 defines no universal acceptance predicate.
Step constraint validity; subject or regulatory conformance; FPF pattern-quality review or admissionE.18 step validity -> A.20; other conformance -> the pattern or regulation that defines its test; FPF pattern-quality review -> E.21; admission, refresh, or return after that review -> E.19. None supplies universal conformance.
Gate decision; permission; release; work-entry readiness; local choice; commitmentGate decision -> A.21; permission, exercise, or conflict -> A.2.8.PER; grant or revocation act -> A.2.9; obligation or prohibition -> A.2.8; release Work -> A.15.1; subject-release relation -> the pattern for its named predicate; readiness -> A.15.5; local choice -> C.11. Ask these separately.
Architecture; architecture description; structural view; problem-to-structure architecturing; reusable structure; cross-scope or interlevel residualArchitecture -> C.30; architecture description -> C.30.AD; structural view -> C.30.ASV; problem-to-structure architecturing -> C.32.P2S; reusable structure -> C.31; cross-scope or interlevel residual -> C.30.ILC.
Module interface; function-like claim; wording useModule-interface relation -> A.6.M; function-like claim -> A.6.F; wording-use repair -> E.10.
Multi-view publication face or form; publication occurrence and bounded availability; explanation faithfulness; publication WorkFace or form -> E.17; publication occurrence and bounded availability -> E.24.PUB; explanation-faithfulness use -> E.17.EFP; rendering, upload, indexing, or other publication Work -> A.15.1 plus the direct relations current for that Work. Form, carrier, occurrence, Work, access, and reliance remain distinct.