E.18.1:5.4 - Filled P2W carry-through notes
Use these as replayable filled examples, not as a second schema beside the compact note in 4.1.
Cooling-loop mathematical-lens continuation.
| Compact note field | Filled value |
|---|---|
| Accepted problem card reference | ProblemCard@Context PC-COOL-017, accepted for a cooling-loop stabilization problem. |
| Carried problem-card claim | The observed deformation is not one more tuning defect; the later method-comparison use relies on preserving the conserved heat-flow structure. |
| Receiving use | Determine the mathematical-lens result needed before any formal-substrate declaration or method comparison. |
| Next practical question | Which structure is preserved, which is lost, and where does the heat-flow lens stop? |
| Applicable pattern | C.29 Mathematical Lens Use. |
| Result written and use it answers | A C.29 local lens-use result naming target phenomenon, candidate mathematical object, preserved structure, lost structure, payoff, declared use, and stop condition. |
| Local non-overread | Method comparison waits until comparator, measurement, and candidate-set relations are named. A later A.6.0 signature declaration is a separate continuation. |
Port-throughput continuation split.
| Compact note field | Filled value |
|---|---|
| Accepted problem card reference | ProblemCard@Context PC-PORT-008, accepted for an integration-throughput problem. |
| Carried problem-card claim | The port-throughput constraint affects integration, but the source phrase does not decide which module-interface, transformation-flow, planning, work, evidence, gate, or architecture relation is current. |
| Receiving use | Make the current module-interface relation and selected transformation-flow structure inspectable without inferring readiness. |
| Next practical question | Which exact relation is being written now? |
| Continuation 1 | Apply A.6.M and write the exact module-interface relation for the port contract. |
| Continuation 2 | Apply E.18 and identify the selected transformation-flow structure and the exact interface-bearing position or binding used by the current question. |
| Stopped cues | Apply A.15.2 only if a planning constraint is actually being written. Evidence, gate, and architecture cues remain stopped until their direct relations are current. |
| Local stop | No readiness result, granted permission, performed-work claim, evidence verdict, or gate decision follows from the port phrase by itself. |