Link to current text
E.18.2:7 - Consequences
| Consequence | Benefit | Cost or mitigation |
| Mathematical descriptions get their own local record. | Graphs, paths, slices, quotients, and wiring can be used without becoming hidden ontology. | One source expression or publication face may need several records. |
| E.18 and E.18.NET stay about selected ontic structures. | One TFS and one network of independently identified TFS members remain inspectable without becoming their mathematical descriptions. | Readers must choose E.18, E.18.NET, or E.18.2 by the current EntityOfConcern. |
| C.29 remains general. | E.18.2 does not duplicate the whole mathematical-lens pattern. | Claim-bearing adequacy needs a C.29 reference. |
| Boundary to work, gates, evidence, and architecture is explicit. | Mathematical prestige does not replace project checks. | Stronger claims require the exact contribution and returned result named for that claim in §4.4. |