E.19:0 - Use this when

Use E.19 when one exact new, substantially revised, or aging FPF pattern edition or bounded subset needs a repeatable admission, refresh, or return-for-repair review. E.19 supplies profile-based questions and conclusion semantics. A reviewer applies the selected questions and returns either repaired text with focused verification or actionable findings.

Use it especially when a draft looks structurally compliant but may still fail on first-minute usability, primary EntityOfConcern stability, terminology, SoTA grounding, related-pattern boundaries, examples, anti-patterns, or shipping-facing authority claims.

Not this pattern when. Use E.8 to write the pattern body. Use E.9 to record the content decision that explains why FPF should change. Use E.9.DA when the question is whether one exact DRR is adequate for a declared downstream authoring use before drafting or host amendment; its ordinary result may be precise findings or repaired text, while exact C.2.1 and coordinate-result apparatus is conditional on a requested reusable result or named reliance. Use E.21 for ordinal pattern-quality evaluation of one exact pattern version. Use E.23 when the aim is repeated quality improvement against an object-under-improvement evaluation rather than one admission or refresh review profile. Use local patterns for the domain rule or constraint being reviewed. Use project gate or release patterns when the question is whether a project publication, work-result record, or release candidate passes a delivery gate. E.19 governs review of FPF pattern admission/refresh only; its profiles and results do not certify the world, project, publication, or release.