Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:16:27 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:17:06 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 05:20:20 UTC

E.19:6 - Bias-Annotation

Lenses tested: Gov, Arch, Onto/Epist, Prag, Did. Scope: Universal (applies to all patterns and all clusters).

Bias risks and mitigations:

  • Governance bias (Gov): reviewers may over-prioritize compliance signals and under-prioritize teaching value. Mitigation: PCP‑BASE checks didactic grounding and internal coherence and prioritizes ontology and semantics.
  • Architecture bias (Arch): internal package architecture can displace the problem-owning domain or practice. Mitigation: test EntityOfConcern, narrowed branch, and practical payoff against the domain/practice question and relevant SoTA under CC-E19-7.
  • Epistemic monoculture (Onto/Epist): SoTA‑Echoing can become single-tradition name-dropping. Mitigation: use multiple traditions when the question or claimed breadth requires them; make substantive disagreement visible. Use F.18 for neutral durable naming when its use condition applies.
  • Pragmatic bias (Prag): a pattern can be “correct” yet unusable. Mitigation: consequences and anti-patterns remain mandatory sections, surfacing material costs or limitations and grounded misuse or application boundaries under E.8; an already established boundary may be referenced.
  • Didactic bias (Did): narrative quality can be mistaken for truth. Mitigation: conformance and SoTA‑Echoing sections bind claims to explicit requirements and lineage.