fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 80717–80727

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 10:39:28 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 10:40:04 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 11:20:03 UTC

E.2.DA:3 - Forces

ForceTension
Constitutional meaning vs evaluationPillar meanings stay in E.2; values over realized adequacy are evaluated here.
Whole-FPF quality vs local qualityOne strong pattern can still sit in a weak corpus ecology.
Discoverability vs precisionReal readers search ordinary words, while claim-bearing wording must preserve its FPF kinds and point to the content that defines, constrains, or tests the claim.
Didactic force vs semantic admissibilityThe text must teach the move without smuggling new ontology into examples or projections.
Breadth vs affordabilityEleven Pillars are complete enough for FPF; affordability comes from compact evidence, not omitted coordinates.
Open-ended evolution vs release stopFPF can improve forever, but one scoped object needs a local stop condition.