Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 10:39:28 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 10:40:04 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 11:15:11 UTC

E.2.DA:8 - Common anti-patterns and repairs

Anti-patternRepair
Pillar essay. A review names Pillars without values or evidence.Produce the complete E.2.DA result form.
Local-quality averaging. Several E.21 values are averaged into FPF adequacy.Re-evaluate Pillar effects over the FPF object.
Sterile or kind-changing precision cleanup. Language is admissible but no longer usable, or the trigger word is gone while the governed object kind, relation or claim kind, admissible use, or scope changed; this includes the current ontic slot, relation position, or use relation when part of the changed FPF-governed claim.Lower P2, P6, and P7 and restore recognition reason, useful action, and pre-repair and post-repair kind evidence; if the current ontic slot, relation position, use relation, or claim kind changed without an accepted decision, treat the cleanup as a blocking semantic defect.
Ontic apparatus without FPF gain. A change adds ontic names, pattern-set maps, publication-boundary prose, or evaluation proof while duplicate ontology, entry confusion, or project-use difficulty remains.Lower the affected Pillar coordinates; repair the governed object, slot-relation boundary, publication split, and user action, or decline the ontic candidate.
Projection authority. A ToC, packet, or companion independently defines or revises a durable pattern rule.Place the authored definition, constraint, test, method instruction, or publication rule in its pattern body; preserve the source-linked public aid’s function under E.11.
Citation shelf. Source rows do not change FPF moves.Lower P11 and state the missing source contribution.
Pillar table without evidence loci. Values are listed but not tied to corpus loci named by value.Recover the needed evidence for Pillar coordinate | Value | ShortRationale | EvidenceLocus. Keep unsupported values as draft material until checked; lower a value only for a defect established under its coordinate meaning.
Goodharted Pillar adequacy. FPF-level values rise because more projection, source, review, or parity evidence was added, while entry recognition, layering, semantic authority, pragmatic utility, source use, or open-ended evolution becomes worse.Reject apparatus-only improvement; apply E.13 when Pillar values become targets replacing Pillar realization; repair the FPF-level content effect, delete or relocate proof material, and record checked no-proposal only when no non-dominated Pillar-content improvement remains.