fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 100893–100902

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:30:10 UTC

E.20:3 - Forces

ForceTension
Extensibility vs Kernel stabilityNew mechanisms need to be addable ↔ kernel reference loci need to remain citeable and minimal.
One governing definition vs cross-locus reachEach mechanism meaning, suite change, WorkPlan planned-baseline change, wiring module, or token migration needs one governing definition while a mechanism introduction often spans suites, plans, wiring, and lexicon.
Didactic usability vs inspectabilityHumans need clear recognition text and examples, while declarations, obligations, and pins must remain checkable at their governing loci.
SoTA evolution vs semantic integrityMethods evolve fast ↔ mechanism meaning SHALL NOT silently shift via wiring updates.
Local naming freedom vs global reference continuityContext-local labels are necessary ↔ references need to remain stable across editions and refactors.