E.23.CAE:4.3 - Qualify the disposition
| Differential disposition | Minimum useful observation | Candidate route | What the observation does not establish |
|---|---|---|---|
outsideClaimedEnvelope | The current demand differs on an envelope coordinate excluded from or unsupported by the current capability claim. | Reframe the claim through A.2.2, or open development only through a separate next-action or choice result. | Loss or forgetting inside the old envelope. |
configurationOrSupportUnavailable | Performance changes with a controlled performer, role, record, tool, interface, authority, state, or environment contrast. | A.15.8 and the direct owner of the failed relation. | Changed holder capability or a human-like memory in a collective. |
responseAvailableUnderReferenceCondition | The prior response or result reappears in a qualified reference condition without new development or update. | Probe applicability, transfer, adaptation, or enactment; then use the applicable steering or choice pattern. | Whole-envelope capability, a particular retrieval mechanism, or sufficient transfer. |
applicabilitySelectionFailureSupported | The response can be produced when selected or prompted, but is not identified, routed, or authorized as applicable under the target demand. | Holder-specific HCD, organization, AI/robotics, or domain inquiry; A.15.7 or C.11 only under their own entry conditions. | One common recognition mechanism or the intervention to choose. |
accessOrActivationFailureSupported | Applicability is established, yet access or activation changes under a controlled cue, task/context, or routing contrast before adaptation and enactment. | Holder-specific access, retrieval, activation, or routing inquiry. | Erased content, a universal latent context, or a sufficient repair. |
contextDependentExpressionOrInterferenceSupported | Expression changes systematically with a qualified context, cue-reliability, or transition-statistics contrast and can reappear without development. | Holder-specific explanation and development Method when separately selected. | The hidden context representation or memory architecture that caused the observation. |
adaptationFailureSupported | The response is selected and available, but cannot be transformed to the changed demand while enactment supports are adequate. | Direct adaptation or domain Method inquiry. | Loss of the original response or the correct adaptation Method. |
enactmentFailureSupported | The response or adapted Method is selected and available, but performer assignment, coordination, authority, body, actuator, interface, tool, or another condition prevents actual Work or its result. | A.15.8, performer/authority owners, and the direct domain Method. | Capability change when the necessary performer arrangement did not obtain. |
capabilityClaimRevisionWarranted | Qualified reference and target probes fail across relevant conditions, envelope and configuration rivals have been addressed, and holder-specific evidence supports changed ability in the stated window. | Reassess the A.2.2 capability claim; use a separate steering or choice result before development. | A specific human, organizational, model, or controller memory mechanism. |
unresolvedDifferential | Safety, missing reference evidence, concurrent updating, coupled changes, insufficient measures, or surviving rivals block a responsible distinction. | Obtain the missing evidence, use a protected test, narrow the claim, or stop. | Permission to choose the most familiar explanation. |
One case may support several ordered dispositions. Keep each observation and its limits visible. No disposition is a ChoiceResult, authorization, selected next Work, or performed Work.