Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:20:20 UTC

E.23.CAE:4.3 - Qualify the disposition

Differential dispositionMinimum useful observationCandidate routeWhat the observation does not establish
outsideClaimedEnvelopeThe current demand differs on an envelope coordinate excluded from or unsupported by the current capability claim.Reframe the claim through A.2.2, or open development only through a separate next-action or choice result.Loss or forgetting inside the old envelope.
configurationOrSupportUnavailablePerformance changes with a controlled performer, role, record, tool, interface, authority, state, or environment contrast.A.15.8 and the direct owner of the failed relation.Changed holder capability or a human-like memory in a collective.
responseAvailableUnderReferenceConditionThe prior response or result reappears in a qualified reference condition without new development or update.Probe applicability, transfer, adaptation, or enactment; then use the applicable steering or choice pattern.Whole-envelope capability, a particular retrieval mechanism, or sufficient transfer.
applicabilitySelectionFailureSupportedThe response can be produced when selected or prompted, but is not identified, routed, or authorized as applicable under the target demand.Holder-specific HCD, organization, AI/robotics, or domain inquiry; A.15.7 or C.11 only under their own entry conditions.One common recognition mechanism or the intervention to choose.
accessOrActivationFailureSupportedApplicability is established, yet access or activation changes under a controlled cue, task/context, or routing contrast before adaptation and enactment.Holder-specific access, retrieval, activation, or routing inquiry.Erased content, a universal latent context, or a sufficient repair.
contextDependentExpressionOrInterferenceSupportedExpression changes systematically with a qualified context, cue-reliability, or transition-statistics contrast and can reappear without development.Holder-specific explanation and development Method when separately selected.The hidden context representation or memory architecture that caused the observation.
adaptationFailureSupportedThe response is selected and available, but cannot be transformed to the changed demand while enactment supports are adequate.Direct adaptation or domain Method inquiry.Loss of the original response or the correct adaptation Method.
enactmentFailureSupportedThe response or adapted Method is selected and available, but performer assignment, coordination, authority, body, actuator, interface, tool, or another condition prevents actual Work or its result.A.15.8, performer/authority owners, and the direct domain Method.Capability change when the necessary performer arrangement did not obtain.
capabilityClaimRevisionWarrantedQualified reference and target probes fail across relevant conditions, envelope and configuration rivals have been addressed, and holder-specific evidence supports changed ability in the stated window.Reassess the A.2.2 capability claim; use a separate steering or choice result before development.A specific human, organizational, model, or controller memory mechanism.
unresolvedDifferentialSafety, missing reference evidence, concurrent updating, coupled changes, insufficient measures, or surviving rivals block a responsible distinction.Obtain the missing evidence, use a protected test, narrow the claim, or stop.Permission to choose the most familiar explanation.

One case may support several ordered dispositions. Keep each observation and its limits visible. No disposition is a ChoiceResult, authorization, selected next Work, or performed Work.