fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 103077–103088

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 12:30:19 UTC

E.23.CAE:6 - Bias-Annotation

Scope: limited. This pattern supplies a conservative cross-holder probe and disposition. It supplies no universal memory substrate, latent context, capability pipeline, organization-learning theory, continual-learning algorithm, intervention catalogue, or choice rule.

LensDeclared bias and counter-check
GovFavors delaying redevelopment until a cheaper differential observation is available. Counter-risk: delay itself causes harm. Use the protected or specialist route and stop when the next probe is not safe or decision-relevant.
ArchFavors one exact holder and explicit configuration. Counter-risk: an organization, team, equipped person, AI service, or robot is admitted as one whole merely because the label is convenient. Reapply the System and capability boundaries.
Onto-EpistFavors separating capability, response, observation, disposition, mechanism claim, choice, Work, and causal claim. Counter-risk: local field names appear to create new kinds. Keep the compact ordinary result and expose the card only for a named receiving use.
PragFavors an A → B → A or similarly discriminating contrast. Counter-risk: repeated probing changes the holder or exceeds its value. Record contamination, narrow the claim, or return unresolvedDifferential.
DidFavors human, organizational, and AI/robot cases to block a human-only analogy. Counter-risk: readers copy case-specific interventions. Reuse only the common observation positions and return mechanisms and interventions to their owners.