E.23.CDI:5 - Archetypal Grounding
Tell. Begin with a current, bounded capability account and a desired result; choose an intervention only after the limiting contribution is known; then test that same target in representative Work. A completed intervention or exercise is activity evidence, not a transfer result.
The compact range table below is a recognition aid: it shows where the Method can be filled differently.
| Case | Holder and intervention | Protected conditions and transfer |
|---|---|---|
| Human capability development | One person or equipped person is the holder. Practice, coaching, tools, provider Work, or self-development may address the limiting contribution. | Protect the conditions relevant to the use, such as safety or autonomy, and check transfer in representative domain Work rather than only in an exercise. |
| Team or organization capability | One admitted team or organization is the holder. Coordination, operating Methods, tooling, redesign, or provider Work may change its capability. | Protect current operations and affected-System burdens; check transfer in current organization Work. |
| Artistic capability | A performer, pair, or ensemble is the admitted holder. The intervention may change technique, rehearsal, partnering, tool use, or support. | Protect the performance conditions that matter to the use; check transfer in the intended social, staged, recorded, or other representative performance Work. |
| Engineering capability | A practitioner, team, builder, or engineering arrangement is the admitted holder. Training, tools, platforms, support, or an organization change may address the limitation. | Protect applicable assurance, configuration, feedback, and delivery conditions; check transfer in representative project or continuing-engineering Work. |
| Operating capability | An operator, operating team, or operating System is the admitted holder. A changed operating Method, tool, coaching, or provider contribution may address the limitation. | Protect service, resilience, financial, human, and downstream conditions that are current; check transfer in representative cases or operating intervals. |
Show — incident-response team. An incident-response team performs drills successfully but loses coordination during real handovers. The team is independently admitted as the holder System for cross-shift handover Work. Its current baseline covers the present roster, dispatch platform, and staffed incidents: in six representative incidents, three handovers omitted the current owner or next action and median coordination recovery took eleven minutes; that evidence remains current only for the present roster and platform through the next quarterly qualification point. The target is five consecutive comparable incidents with owner, current state, and next action handed over within three minutes, without worsening response time or safety. The project changes rehearsal and handover support.
In the next five comparable staffed incidents, every handover carried owner, current state, and next action within three minutes; median response time and recorded safety outcomes did not worsen. That transfer result supports a post-intervention capability statement only for the stated roster, platform, and qualification window. It does not by itself prove that the development Work caused a world-side Transformation.
Show again — robotic inspection cell. One calibrated robotic vision cell is the holder System for inspecting machined impellers under the declared lighting, temperature, part-finish, and software-configuration envelope. On 200 representative parts, the current configuration detects 89 percent of the seeded reportable cracks, raises 9 percent false alerts, and takes 40 seconds per part; the account remains current through the named calibration window. The target is at least 97 percent detection, at most 5 percent false alerts, and at most 45 seconds per part while traceability and safety interlocks remain unchanged. The intervention changes optical calibration and the inspection Method with support from the sensor provider.
Across 300 production-like parts over three shifts, the cell reaches 98 percent detection, 4.3 percent false alerts, and 43 seconds per part with no traceability or interlock failure. That transfer result supports a post-intervention capability statement for the tested configuration and window. The provider’s work remains separate from the cell’s capability. The transfer result does not establish a causal Transformation without an obtaining Work-to-change claim.