fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 104201–104206

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 14:25:10 UTC

E.24.CD:12 - Relations

  • Builds on: E.24 for durable ontic settlement; E.24.UK for separate public U-kind admission; C.2.1 for exact episteme constitution; C.3, C.3.1, and C.3.2 for local typed projection; E.24.PUB for publication; C.29 and C.2.P.DR for representation and declarative-form overread; A.6.5 for SlotSpec declaration and participant-designation discipline; A.6.RSIR, A.6.F, A.6.P, E.10, and E.10.ARCH for bounded ambiguity repair; and F.18 for naming after the governed value is settled.
  • Coordinates with: A.6.RCD when the missing piece is a relation-bearing claim that no current direct predicate closes. A local compound claim or predicate-definition episteme is neither a relation kind nor an occurrence; only a separately justified kind candidate proceeds through E.24 and E.24.UK. It also coordinates with E.17.0 for actual view membership; A.1, B.1, B.2, A.14, and C.13 for a surviving constructed-whole question; A.3.4, A.15.1, the temporal patterns, and C.28 for actual change, work, temporal, and causal claims; A.6.0 and C.29 for formal-substrate and mathematical-lens use; C.22.PFR, C.22.2, E.18.1, and E.23 for actual Problem, problem-side formulation, and later problematization; A.19 for U.CharacteristicSpace; and A.19.ECS for evaluation-characteristic construction.
  • Used by: DRRs and authoring work that must decide whether a recurring construct uses an existing subject pattern, remains one or several bounded epistemes, becomes a local typed projection, applies description or publication handling, receives wording repair, opens E.24, or remains unresolved.