Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:25:05 UTC

E.24.CD:7 - Conformance Checklist

CheckRequirement
CC-E24CD-1The first-use disposition starts with a recognizable work or decision and the subject or claim that blocks it.
CC-E24CD-2A visible card, row, schema, diagram, filename, or field bundle is not treated as the subject merely by form.
CC-E24CD-3Independently governed objects and direct predicates are recovered before a new ontic or kind is proposed.
CC-E24CD-4A current subject pattern is applied when it already closes the needed claim. A relation-bearing claim that no current predicate closes goes through A.6.RCD; a local compound claim or predicate-definition episteme is not thereby a relation kind or occurrence.
CC-E24CD-5One C.2.1 episteme requires one exact ClaimGraph, one truthful exact EntityOfConcern, and one effective ReferenceScheme. Otherwise epistemes remain separate, and co-use or co-publication supplies no shared identity.
CC-E24CD-6Local classification uses C.3.2’s kind, signature, judgment, and optional extension distinction and does not imply a public U.* kind or direct classification relation.
CC-E24CD-7Episteme, view membership, publication form, representation, carrier, and publication occurrence remain separate and use their subject patterns only when current.
CC-E24CD-8E.24 opens from a blocked use, an independently recoverable candidate, proposal, or source construct, concrete duplication or disagreement pressure across named patterns, named plausible consumers, and failure of one obvious direct route. E.24.CD supplies those entry facts; E.24 owns the identity rule, minimal relation set, dependent-use judgement, non-duplication result, practical gain, declared use, and applicability limits, and may return unresolved.
CC-E24CD-9Any public U-kind question is handled by E.24.UK as a separate admission result; E.24.CD admits neither ontic nor kind.
CC-E24CD-10No candidate cluster, registry, scorecard, or mandatory disposition form is created.
CC-E24CD-11The result names the exact pattern applied to the exact subject or claim, or a precise unresolved stop, and gives the next action or return condition. Any denied reading passes F.19’s grounded-contribution test.
CC-E24CD-12A record-shaped false candidate keeps holder, status bearer and value, method, mechanism, plan, work, evidence item and use, result and relation, target and subject relation, and source and source-use relation distinct; absent fields and row shape establish none of them.
CC-E24CD-13Bare role uses E.10.ROLE and then the recovered branch; ambiguous relation, slot, interface, function, and endpoint wording uses its matching precision-restoration pattern. None becomes ontology by wording alone.
CC-E24CD-14Declarative-form agency is blocked through C.2.P.DR, and reusable naming starts in F.18 only after the governed value and any needed relation settlement are available.
CC-E24CD-15Wording such as situation, incident, current configuration, operating <system>, or emergency recovers only the Systems, claims, Work, change, and temporal or causal relations needed by the current use; their conjunction creates neither U.Situation nor U.IncidentSituation. Every asserted actual Work first recovers each precise performer’s A.13 core and is independently admitted under A.15.1 from its performance history, Method, time, and containing System. F.6 is added only when precise assignment-bound attribution is also current; local system-role-kind classification remains separate. Intended action stays plan or other modal content until its predicates obtain.
CC-E24CD-16Arbitrary fusion, co-presence, connectedness, or a chosen boundary creates no whole. Only a surviving constructed-object candidate is tested for exact inputs, whole-forming relations, and identity under B.1, A.14, C.13, and B.2 when reidentification is current.
CC-E24CD-17Mathematical inconsistency names exact claims or epistemes, the declared formal substrate, and the direct inconsistency or consequence relation; it establishes no world event, causation, Work, Transformation, Problem, or situation.
CC-E24CD-18A ProblemCard, signal, forecast, scenario, formulation, actual Problem, and later problematization or work remain under C.22.2, C.22.PFR, and their exact continuation governors rather than one card-derived ontic.