E.24.UK:5.3 - Broad rule-content provision/support candidate

A proposal groups phrases such as “this pattern defines or constrains the result”, “the framework supports the claim”, and “service provision” under one public kind. The phrases do not identify common individuals: one locates defining claim content, another may describe evidence or source use, and the third may designate dated Work, a Method, promise content, or an operational bearer. They share neither an identity or membership rule nor a receiver that needs the proposed instances as one kind.

Recover each material occurrence first under C.2.1 and its exact subject relation. Then return reject for the broad candidate. Each result cites the corresponding assertion through RejectedCandidateRecoveryRef; it does not cite the shared word list or migration table. Genuine Work, source, evidence, publication, authority, access, and direct-relation claims survive unchanged in their own meanings. An unrecovered occurrence stays unchanged. The rejection admits no U.Provision, U.Support, generic SupportRelation, governance occurrence, or rule-locus description kind.