fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 102914–102923

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 07:05:20 UTC

E.24:3 - Forces

ForceTension
Ontic stability vs bounded local explanationA durable FPF ontic needs stable identity plus named direct relation kinds and their exact defining or constraining ClaimGraph sources; a bounded local episteme keeps its C.2.1 identity and needs only the claims and references required for one use family.
Reuse vs overgrowthDependent patterns may need one stable direct relation and a reusable declaration; premature U.* growth creates another ontology.
Ontology rule content vs pattern placementThe primary subject kind, exact identity or constitution rule, minimal relation set, exact subject assertions, and their defining or constraining ClaimGraph sources determine the ontic-introduction decision; a pattern nest is only publication and specialization placement under E.8.
Draft citeability vs current rule contentDraft ToC rows can guide investigation, and an accepted DRR can carry the authoring decision, but current exact rule content for FPF use resides in the defining or constraining ClaimGraph; a pattern id only locates it.
Naming vs ontologyF.18 can improve a name, but naming cannot decide identity, direct relations, declarations, species, or the reliance basis of dependent patterns.