E.24:4.4a - Recover broad rule-content, provision, and support wording before admission

Do not admit a generic governance, provision, support, or rule-locus ontic merely because several patterns use those words. First freeze the exact source occurrence and recover what it says by value: an exact subject assertion, defining or constraining ClaimGraph, direct relation, Work occurrence, Method or MethodDescription, promise or commitment content, source use, publication, evidence, assurance, authority, access, or ordinary-language claim. The recovered C.2.1 assertion is the preservation object for that occurrence; a shared dispatch table, field name, or word family is not.

A broad candidate fails the durable-ontic test when its proposed members have no common identity or membership rule and no non-duplicative receiving use. In that case E.24 supplies no umbrella object. Keep each narrow recovered meaning under its existing pattern and use E.24.UK for the associated U-kind question with an occurrence-local reject. The rejection’s RejectedCandidateRecoveryRef must resolve the exact preserved assertion. If the occurrence has not yet been recovered, leave its material wording unchanged rather than deleting content under a lexical rule.

This rule blocks generic U.Provision, U.Support, SupportRelation, governance relation kinds or occurrences, and rule-locus description kinds unless a later, independently accepted case supplies exact individuals, identity, membership, non-members, and a receiver that cannot use existing assertions and relations. It does not block genuine service-provision Work, operational support Work, evidence support, source use, publication support, human or institutional authority, or another exact relation whose own predicate obtains.