E.24:5.3 - Draft ToC Row or Planned Pattern Label as False Authority

A draft ToC row or older source label may name a calculus, family, or object before current FPF has an exact defining or constraining ClaimGraph for it. Such a label can guide investigation, but it cannot establish current FPF use.

Example: older source wording may name a method calculus before current pattern text contains exact rule content for it. If no current defining or constraining ClaimGraph states it, the label is not current FPF rule content. Use the exact ClaimGraph sources located at A.3.1 for method semantics, A.3.2 for method description, A.15.2 for work planning, A.15.1 for dated work, and B.1.5 for method composition when ordering is current. A separate method calculus can constrain other subject assertions only after it has its own E.24-style ontic decision, stable identity, named direct relation kinds with obtaining and occurrence-identity rules, and dependent-use declaration.

The same test applies to any draft ToC row or planned pattern label. If no current defining or constraining ClaimGraph states the label’s meaning, do not cite it as ontology. Either cite current exact subject assertions and their pattern-description locators, keep the label as investigation context, or open an E.24 ontic-introduction decision.