E.24:8 - Relations

• Builds on: A.6.REL for direct relation occurrence identity, each direct relation pattern for relation-participant meanings, obtaining, applicability, and occurrence identity, and A.6.RCD for a residual needed claim or a derived-or-primitive candidate with its proposed direct subject settlement; A.6.0 and A.6.5 govern reusable RelationSignature and SlotSpec declarations, and C.2.1 governs decision, assertion, predicate-definition, and description epistemes.
• Coordinates with: E.8 for pattern publication placement, E.10 and E.10.ARCH for wording-use restoration, and F.18 for durable naming after ontology is settled.
• Coordinates with: E.24.CD for candidate detection before the ontic-introduction decision, E.24.UK for the UKindAdmissionResult output of the one shared E24FamilySettlementDecision, and E.24.PUB for ontic-description and publication distinctions. When both a new ontic and a new public U-kind are needed, E.24 and E.24.UK consume the same atomic decision inputs and neither treats the other’s output as prior evidence.
• Coordinates with: E.17.0 for U.View membership, A.6.3 for optional viewing construction, C.29 for mathematical representation, and the E.14 -> B.3.5 -> C.13 chain for structural constructive grounding. Each ontic-introduction decision names any additional subject-specific subject patterns instead of treating this relation list as a registry.
• Coordinates with: A.19.ECS for contested comparison of candidate dispositions, E.9 and E.9.DA for recording and evaluating the authoring decision, and E.21 for evaluating the resulting pattern. Those evaluation results do not become part of the selected ontic.
• Used by: FPF authors when repeated relation and declaration material may need one durable ontic rather than subject pattern use or claims coordinated only inside a bounded local episteme.