Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 08:50:20 UTC

E.4.DPF.DA:3 - Forces

ForceTension
Domain boundedness vs FPF generalityThe DPF must be strong for one domain or local context, not a second FPF Core.
Pattern quality vs package qualityStrong individual patterns can still form a weak package if source, relation, publication, or refresh structures are missing.
Fast seeds vs reliance-bearing packagesA seed may be useful for exploration, but public or operational use needs higher evidence and repair routes.
Source richness vs source theatreA long bibliography can decorate the package while missing adopted payload, rejected alternatives, currentness, and pattern consequences.
Local usability vs formal assuranceReaders need first moves and worked cases, while maintainers need edition, dependency, relation, quality, and refresh records.
Improvement vs proxy optimizationAdding maps, source rows, all-5 claims, or review proof can make the package less usable.