fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 81778–81788

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 14:25:10 UTC

E.4.FPF:3 - Forces

ForceTension
First principles vs domain knowledgeFPF must carry transdisciplinary ontology, epistemology, evidence, architecture, decision, work, publication, and improvement distinctions without becoming a doctrine of one domain.
Public adoption vs subject-pattern authorityReadme, Preface, examples, cards, skills, and MCP access must help new users without becoming a second spec.
Core stability vs evolutionFPF needs stable dependability for downstream DPFs, while the framework remains open to new patterns, better terminology, and source-front movement.
Pattern-set quality vs whole-framework qualityIndividual E.21 results matter, but they do not equal whole-FPF Pillar adequacy.
Carrier plurality vs identityThe same FPF edition can use several publication units and forms, several exact presentation carriers, and several access routes; those different objects must not create competing FPFs or collapse into one another.
Access convenience vs architecture clarityA callable access route can make FPF easier to use while hiding edition, currentness, source, and authority boundaries.