E.5:1 - Problem frame

FPF positions itself as a timeless, universal “operating system for thought.” Collaborative projects of this scope face four predictable entropic pulls:

1. Implementation gravity – concept prose accretes tool jargon.
2. Notation lock‑in – one diagram style becomes “the language.”
3. Convenience cycles – quick fixes create reverse dependencies.
4. Disciplinary monoculture – implicit bias colours “universal” rules.

Left unchecked, these forces erode Pillars P‑1 Cognitive Elegance, P‑4 Open‑Ended Kernel and P‑5 FPF Layering.