E.8:4.2.2.1 - Precision-restoration placement discipline
When a pattern or companion text is drafted from E.10 or E.10.ARCH, distinguish three authoring objects:
semanticAreais the Part-F semantic unit for a wording-use restoration row: one Concept-Set row, one UTS row, or an explicitly bounded row-set. It is declared withsemanticAreaBaseConceptandsemanticAreaSenseFamily.ontologicalNeighborhoodis the applicability neighborhood around that namedsemanticArea: nearby primaryEntityOfConcernkinds, relation kinds, claim records, content that defines or constrains the current use, non-use boundaries, and remaining reader use that can carry the recovered meaning after the wording is repaired.pattern nestis the publication and specialization placement of a pattern under a declared family or membership relation.
These are not synonyms. A precision-restoration pattern is placed in the pattern nest whose primary EntityOfConcern, relation record, or claim record it repairs. Its semanticArea states the Part-F semantic unit it repairs, while its ontologicalNeighborhood may name several direct relations and pattern content that defines or constrains the asserted uses. For example, quality-term repair lives in the C.16 characterization nest, even though its neighbouring relations can include relation construction, action invitation, evidence, assurance, source-use assignment, engineering quality bundles, pattern-quality evaluation, or mathematical-lens use.
Affected patterns should use a thin pointer when the first-stage wording repair belongs elsewhere. The pointer names the selected restoration pattern and the condition that triggers it; it does not copy the trigger registry, the full E.10.ARCH recovery algorithm, or a second local architecture for the same repair. The affected pattern then keeps its own subject matter: the characteristic, structure, view, episteme, relation, evidence, assurance, gate, work, decision, or adequacy question it already governs.
If a draft proposes a new precision-restoration pattern, the authoring claim must show the repeated wording failure, semanticAreaBaseConcept, semanticArea, semanticAreaSenseFamily, the recovered primary EntityOfConcern kind or relation/claim record, the intended pattern nest, the neighboring governing relations, and the admissible action left after repair. A new pattern is not justified merely because a word appears often, because a local checklist wants a bucket, or because a campaign needs a tidy grouping.