Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 14:36:52 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 14:38:14 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 15:10:10 UTC

E.9:2 - Problem

Direct edits to the Core, or DRRs that preserve apparatus without a usable selected answer, trigger four systemic hazards:

  1. Lost decision grounds – future authors cannot recover why the answer was selected, which alternative or boundary mattered, or when to reopen it.
  2. Decision deferral – a polished record leaves the answer, affected loci, or first drafting action for each later author to invent again.
  3. Proxy-led fanout – an abstract rule passes a schema, checklist, or unrelated replay while making an actual predecessor/proposed host harder to understand or use.
  4. Conceptual and authority drift – incremental edits blur the framework’s foundations, or the temporary rationale record becomes a shadow Core law, process brief, or authorization source.