When the complete policy is still missing

The D comparison above starts from complete, supported policies. When a new request instead supplies only an initial repair price, EAM.8 constructs the policy before EAM.9 compares it. In its separate asset E case, initial work supports three years but the service is required for four; the further overhaul, its window and temporary service belong to the alternative. Omitting that work reverses the apparent cost preference while leaving year four unsupported.

FIN.6 supplies the dated financial account for the stated technical policy, and FIN.7 supplies its ending valuation. Moving only the end of the explicit table to year two requires a value that represents the same later cash and ending premise; EAM.8 shows that the whole present cost and preference remain unchanged. Ending the service at year two instead changes the required policy and uses actual exit consequences. A different supplied valuation must be reconciled to its changed assumptions before it can change the recommendation. If an observation later changes technical support or the ending premise, EAM.13 returns the affected policy to EAM.8 and the comparison. D’s supplied five-year premises and the programme calculation below remain their own case.