When the demand basis changes

The original sixteen combinations use the supplied North wet-season requirement of 1,100 m³/h. Suppose a later, separately qualified demand account gives 1,250 for a period the asset choice must cover. EAM.4 establishes its component basis, coincidence and status as a forecast or commitment; its Westbank example shows that construction with separate teaching inputs. EAM.6 then compares the new scenario with the 1,200 contribution supported by either current C option. The 50 m³/h gap means none of the sixteen existing combinations supplies that scenario. Re-ranking their costs cannot repair the missing service.

Return to EAM.7 for an additional supported contribution or a qualified demand-management alternative, then compare the resulting policies and combinations on the revised premises. A proposal to change the service obligation goes to its actual authority. The original programme calculation remains applicable to its original conditions. If later observations reveal the changed driver, EAM.13 reopens this affected account and its option consequences.