Library / Explanation Design Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:55:09 UTC

EXD.6:11 - SoTA-Echoing

FPF C.2.8 supplies the common structural characteristic; C.11.CRC/C.11 supply the contribution and marginal-choice questions. ME.22 and HCD.19 provide concrete comparison and repair practices at their subject scopes. Adopt those supplied operations and retain their distinct answer criteria.

Mengelkamp et al., 2025 distinguish comprehension and metacomprehension outcomes for informative narratives and exposition under reading-goal conditions. Their mixed results qualify any fixed genre or goal recipe. Fichtel et al., 2025 likewise distinguish more co-constructive behavior from a significant mean objective-understanding advantage.

The serious alternative is to select the most fluent, extensive or visually attractive explanation without a receiving comparison. In the worked case, the smallest account/form/help distinction can change the repair while leaving a sufficient incumbent available. Reopen when the task, subject basis, recipient, assistance, budget or relied-on evidence changes.