F.0.1:11 - SoTA-Echoing
| Current practice line and exact sources | Decision and effect in F.0.1 | Limit kept visible |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 1087:2019 and ISO 704:2022 distinguish objects, concepts, definitions, and designations. | Adopt, with a boundary. Recover the source-local designation and concept contribution before comparison. | Standard status establishes neither one universal vocabulary nor the receiving claim. |
| Kapferer and Zimmermann, Domain-driven Architecture Modeling and Rapid Prototyping with Context Mapper (2021), keep a software-domain model and language within a named DDD boundary and make inter-boundary relations explicit. | Adapt as a software-domain example. Use that boundary only when a DDD bounded context is the actual subject. | It does not warrant a transdisciplinary U.BoundedContext or make that object the source of all meaning. |
| Abd Nikooie Pour et al., Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2025 (2025); Giglou et al., LLMs4OM (2024); Hu and Ichise, From Matching to Retrieval: A New Role for LLMs in Ontology Alignment (2025); and Qiang et al., OAEI-LLM (2024). | Adapt. Use lexical, structural, retrieved, or model-produced correspondences to find candidates worth inspecting; establish an F.9 relation only from the exact recovered senses and its relation profile. | A benchmark result, similarity score, or model answer establishes neither semantic identity nor the separate C.2.1 claim that a Bridge suits a receiving use. |
| W3C SHACL (2017) and DCAT 3 (2024) separate constraints, validation, catalog metadata, versions, and provenance from described subject claims. | Adapt. Keep source and edition metadata recoverable and use a compact source note when useful. | Metadata form, validation, or provenance establishes neither meaning, truth, reliance, nor assurance. |
The non-dominated combination is a plain local answer first, an exact durable address only for reuse, an inspectable relation only when current, and receiving-use judgment separately.