Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 08:30:15 UTC

F.0.2:3 - Forces

ForceTension
Positive contribution vs source fidelityThe receiving framework needs a usable claim, while sources must not be flattened into one vocabulary.
Small first result vs broad inquiryOne authoring decision may need only a bounded comparison, while a large research programme may need the full G.2 pack.
Similarity vs identityMatching can propose correspondences, while sameness, truth, and adoption require separate claims.
Integration vs contrastA synthesis should open a productive move, while a real disagreement or non-fit must remain visible.
Progress vs epistemic restraintWork should continue where the basis suffices, while a load-bearing source gap must prevent reliance.
Reuse vs domain dependenceThe synthesis method can remain transdisciplinary, while domain claims and their source refresh stay in their subject DPF.