F.10:4.6 - Bridge and interpretation discipline

Status meanings do not travel by label. When a comparison needs semantic correspondence between different <ReferenceScheme, LocalSenseClaim> projections, resolve the exact F.17 cells and test the F.9 predicate. Cite an obtaining Bridge as the semantic premise alongside the separate bounded-use claim and current A.10 or B.3 reliance needed by that use. Its Card or description is separate and optional; optional F.9 CL remains evidence-strength shorthand, not a use threshold. The Bridge makes no status-use occurrence obtain and produces no target result.

When one status-use occurrence is used to explain or evaluate a status question of another family, scheme, or modality, recover an exact StatusInterpretationRelation:

StatusInterpretationRelation:
  SourceStatusUseOccurrenceRef:
  TargetStatusQuestionRef:
  Direction:
  InterpretationRuleRef:
  EffectiveReferenceScheme:
  ClaimScopeAndWindow:
  BridgeRef:                    # only when the use needs an obtaining F.9 semantic relation between different local-sense projections
  IntendedUse:

It obtains only when the named interpretation rule admits that source occurrence for the exact target question, direction, scope, window, and use. Its occurrence identity is the exact ordered <SourceStatusUseOccurrenceRef, TargetStatusQuestionRef, Direction, InterpretationRuleRef, ClaimScopeAndWindow, IntendedUse> tuple; a Bridge ref is a separate qualifying premise when the use needs an obtaining F.9 semantic relation between different local-sense projections. A family edge, shared word, Bridge, table row, or source order is not this relation. The rule application and its result claim remain separate. Identify dated evaluation Work only when its history is current and independently admitted under A.13/A.15.1. Even a positive interpretation relation does not by itself produce RequirementStatus=Satisfied, StandardStatus=Approved, a gate result, permission, assurance, or actual later reliance.