F.10:5.1 - Service acceptance from runtime evidence

July uptime is first recovered as an exact C.16 measurement result, stated by a distinct C.2.1 episteme. A.2.4 classifies that episteme for the uptime claim, and F.10 may assert EvidenceStatus=Measured for that exact claim, scheme, scope, and July window.

The SLO clause and service target are independently recovered. Dated evaluation work applies the SLO rule to the measurement result through exact bindings and produces a requirement-evaluation result claim. Only that basis can support a separate RequirementStatus=Satisfied occurrence. If monitoring and service-management senses differ, an F.9 Bridge handles the cells and a StatusInterpretationRelation handles the admitted explanatory/evaluation use. The measurement, evidence status, bridge, interpretation, evaluation work/result, requirement status, dashboard display, gate, assurance, and release decision remain distinct.