CC-F10-01 Target and direct result | Are the exact target, target identity, direct governor, and any consumed domain result/result episteme recovered before status is applied? |
CC-F10-02 Local value | Does the status expression resolve to an exact F.17 SchemeSenseCell under an effective ReferenceScheme and to one family/direct status pattern? |
CC-F10-03 Use occurrence | Are bearer, target, value, scheme, scope, window, intended use, and direct obtaining basis explicit? |
CC-F10-04 Source | Are source assertion/register, edition/order rule, provenance path, and G.11 currentness result recovered when they decide use? |
CC-F10-05 Assessment | Are each consumed rule application and evaluation-result claim separate, and is any claimed dated evaluation Work independently admitted with its actual enacted Method? |
CC-F10-06 Assertion/display | Is the C.2.1 status-assertion episteme distinct from publication occurrence, form, rendering, carrier, row, and dashboard cell? |
CC-F10-07 Modality | Are evidence status, standard approval, requirement status, and every direct result kept distinct? |
CC-F10-08 Bridge | When the use needs semantic correspondence between different local-sense projections, are the exact F.9 occurrence, separate bounded-use claim and required reliance recoverable, while Card/description remains separate? |
CC-F10-09 Interpretation | Does cross-family or cross-modality explanation name the exact StatusInterpretationRelation, direction, rule, scope/window, and use? |
CC-F10-10 Design-run | Are standard approval, runtime evidence, requirement evaluation, and runtime satisfaction separate? |
CC-F10-11 Receiving use | Is each actual premise/gate/assurance/permission/release/decision use grounded under its direct governor, with dated Work separately admitted only when that occurrence is claimed, rather than inferred from intended use or display? |
CC-F10-12 No creation | Does status neither define/create its target nor turn evidence absence into target falsity? |
CC-F10-13 No system-role drift | Does evidence, status, standard, or requirement use refrain from establishing System admission, a local system-role classification, or an assignment? When a receiving claim needs an assignment, does it name the occurrence and its declared species? Does the occurrence carry every required participant value and have the independently admitted System as holder? |
CC-F10-14 Subject-pattern boundary | Do evidence provenance, assurance, causal use, publication, gate, permission, commitment, work, requirement evaluation, approval act, and decision remain with direct governors? |