F.16:14 - Acceptance tests

SCR-F16-S01 (recognition). Situation, failure, gain, and worked claim are clear to a cold reader.
SCR-F16-S02 (actual subjects). No cell, row, label, or record substitutes for an actual value.
SCR-F16-S03 (direct relations). Every substantive relation names its exact participants and cites the pattern that defines or tests it; unsupported proxy wording ends at A.6.RCD missing-governor.
SCR-F16-S04 (conditional F.9). F.9 appears only for a real relation between distinct local meanings.
SCR-F16-S05 (source and evidence). Exact sources and editions and the A.10 evidence-use basis are visible where they affect the claim; B.3 appears only for an actual named assurance claim.
SCR-F16-S06 (optional aids). Cells and tables are omitted when they do not reduce reader effort and are never evidential.
SCR-F16-S07 (time and agency). Windows, Work, System, assignment, and attribution are explicit when material.
SCR-F16-S08 (one-page parsimony). Every included item changes the answer; a larger case is split without losing its basis.
SCR-F16-S09 (evaluation architecture). When evaluation is present, the performing System, evaluation Work, enacted Method, exact application and result binding, declared result scale, separate EvidenceStatus and RequirementStatus, and optional verdict episteme remain recoverable.

RSCR-F16-E01 (edition drift). Changed editions reopen only affected local claims and relations; no silent rewrite.
RSCR-F16-E02 (relation change). A changed relation updates dependent conclusions and limits, not unrelated parts of the page.
RSCR-F16-E03 (sense split). A changed local claim leaves no ambiguous F.17 address or table entry.
RSCR-F16-E04 (window change). Changed cadence or population creates an explicit new evaluation boundary.
RSCR-F16-E05 (plain-language guard). Repairing ontology does not replace readable sentences with avoidable symbolic or bureaucratic language.