F.16:9 - Relations

Builds on:

• Use F.1 for the exact source cut and F.0.1 and F.17 for each local claim or durable address actually needed by the case.
• Use F.7 only for a readable comparison surface and F.9 only for relations that actually obtain between exact local meanings, together with the separate bounded-use claim.
• Use E.10.D1 to replace vague context wording with the source, scheme, scope, model use, working situation, comparison basis, or other value that changes the case.
• Use F.10 for status claims and their windows. Use each direct subject rule for the worked checks; add F.15 only for the example’s finite naming slice.

Coordinates with: F.4 and F.6 only when a local system-role kind, assignment, or performed-Work attribution is actually part of the case; A.10 for evidence use; B.3 only when an actual named assurance claim is current; and the direct Part C pattern for every illustrated subject and relation.

Constrains: A cross-domain example may use this canvas or a faithful reduction. It names claim and gain first, actual values and relations next, and optional aids last. It never treats a lexical cell, table row, page layout, or generic Bridge as proof.