F.17:12.4c - Demonstrative walkthrough and bounded mantra

A.22.CGUS:4.4 permits a separate C.2.1 episteme that shows one traversal through an already qualified CGUS for a declared teaching or comparison use. It does not define a demonstrative-slice U.Kind, and the token DemonstrativeUnfoldingSlice@Context does not identify one exact slice. The current sources also do not constitute FPFSeminarTeachingReferenceScheme-2026-07-11 as a second by-value reference scheme. F.17 therefore records no demonstrative-slice row, seminar SenseCell, Bridge, bounded-use claim, or current public-row result from those tokens.

Use demonstrative walkthrough as ordinary readable wording for a shown traversal when the sentence makes the exact slice clear. Keep mantra as bounded seminar or pattern-local recall wording when repetition and attention are the point. Neither expression creates a kind, episteme, scheme, cell, Bridge, row, or publication occurrence. mantra move remains E.10.MOVE Plain wording for an E.11.PUA practice-continuation description when such a description is actually shown; ordinary long and local mantras receive no F.17 row.

If a later use needs a durable public name, first recover one exact slice episteme under C.2.1 from its claim content, the qualified CGUS it concerns, and its effective scheme. F.18 may then record one naming settlement and F.17 may record one row after the ordinary gate. A second cell and F.9 Bridge are justified only when another exact scheme-and-sense projection and a named current correspondence use both exist. Availability of any selected row edition still requires a separate exact E.24.PUB publication package.