Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 07:42:37 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 07:43:27 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 08:00:10 UTC

F.18:4.1 - Naming Invariants

Every durable name must satisfy these invariants.

InvariantRequired content
Governed value firstName the governed value or value family before naming the label.
Direct pattern visibleCite the pattern description containing the exact defining or constraining ClaimGraph for the value: for example A.2 with C.3 for a local system-role kind, A.2.1 for one system-role assignment species, A.6.5 for relation slot discipline, F.10 or A.19.SPR for status-value use, and A.10 for evidence use.
Reference scheme visibleThe NameCard carries the effective U.ReferenceScheme by value; a model-use structure, claim scope, project work, or other locality relation remains separate and appears only when the naming use needs it.
Local sense visibleEvery card states one exact local-sense claim under the effective scheme. A progressive-minimum card may state it directly as LocalSenseRef; an expanded card uses LocalSenseCellRef only when it resolves to the current F.17 scheme-based coordinate. Any basis episteme and local-sense basis relation remain separate.
Two labels when reusableThe Tech label is precise; the Plain label helps ordinary readers. Both point to the same governed value.
Candidate comparison visibleAt least two plausible head families are considered unless a cited external standard fixes the label.
Bridge only between different semantic-context projectionsCompare the exact <ReferenceScheme, LocalSenseClaim> pairs. Same scheme plus same claim plus another expression is a designation question and creates no Bridge. Same scheme plus another claim opens the F.9 question and, for a named use, the separate claim-and-reliance branch. Different scheme also opens only the Bridge question. No current correspondence use creates no Bridge or use claim regardless of scheme count. An obtaining Bridge establishes only the exact sense relation; it establishes neither governed-value identity nor authorization.
Lineage visibleRename, split, merge, retirement, and alias decisions are recorded.