F.18:4.2c - Demonstrative wording without a fabricated value or scheme

A.22.CGUS:4.4 permits one exact C.2.1 episteme to show a traversal through an already qualified CGUS. It does not define a demonstrative-slice U.Kind, and DemonstrativeUnfoldingSlice@Context does not identify an exact slice by itself. The current sources also do not constitute FPFSeminarTeachingReferenceScheme-2026-07-11 as a second by-value scheme whose interpretation differs from FPFCoreReferenceScheme.

Keep demonstrative walkthrough as ordinary readable wording when a sentence already makes the exact shown slice clear. Keep mantra as bounded seminar or pattern-local recall wording when repetition and attention are the point. Do not manufacture two NameCards, SenseCells, a Bridge, a bounded-use claim, or current F.17 rows from those phrases. No naming settlement or public-row status is current here.

If a later use needs stable citation of one exact slice, first recover that C.2.1 episteme from its claim content, the qualified CGUS it concerns, and its effective scheme. Then make one NameCard only if durable naming is useful. Add another card and a Bridge only if a second exact scheme-and-sense projection materially changes interpretation and one named correspondence use is current. Availability remains a separate E.24.PUB operation. mantra move stays E.10.MOVE Plain wording for a shown E.11.PUA continuation description; it is not a durable value or a second scheme.