Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 07:05:20 UTC

F.18:8 - Anti-Patterns And Repairs

Anti-patternOntological failureRepair
“Same spelling means same value.”Treats string identity or a sense Bridge as governed-value identity and lets the Bridge silently license reuse.Compare the exact <ReferenceScheme, LocalSenseClaim> projections. Same projection plus another expression stays with designation. Different projections open the F.9 question; only an obtaining Bridge can then support a separate C.2.1 naming-use claim with current A.10 or B.3 reliance. Apply the direct object subject pattern for any governed-value identity claim, or keep the values separate.
“Evidence role” for a report, source, or standard.Turns an episteme or source-use relation into a work-facing classification or assignment.Recover evidence-use, source-use, status-use, publication-use, or assurance-use relation.
“Night operator role” when only schedule differs.Bakes temporal admission into local-kind identity.Keep the exact operator system-role kind; put the time window in the assignment, status, or WorkPlan.
“Certified engineer role” when certification is evidence or admission.Bakes capability evidence or admission into the kind name.Keep EngineerSystemRole only when that exact local kind is admitted; record capability evidence, admission, or status relation separately.
“Role-derived method” treated as a role-relation result.Confuses role wording with Method identity.Name the Method or Method family under A.3.1. If a separately identified U.MethodDescription episteme is current, name it separately under A.3.2 only when its exact EntityOfConcern is that Method; cite the exact system-role-kind or assignment requirement separately when it is current.
“Method algebra” treated as the method or plan.Confuses a mathematical or representation lens with exact method-side relations, their optional A.22-selected MethodRelationStructure, a MethodDescription, WorkPlan, or performed Work.Before naming, recover the exact relation, optional selected structure, method description, C.29 lens use, work plan, or work occurrence through the rule that identifies or tests that value.
Action nominal, WBS element, or Work Package treated as performed work.Function/method morphology or intended-work content is mistaken for one dated occurrence; a nearby result is folded into the work name.Recover the exact A.15.1 occurrence basis, apply A.6.P.WMR if the relation is still hidden, and name neighboring production claims, measurement results, evaluation results, delivery occurrences, and acceptance verdicts separately.
Role-looking interface wording for API, port, or boundary.Uses role morphology to avoid recovering port, signature, boundary, or interface-specific relation.Use A.6.RSIR and the subject-pattern locator; name the recovered relation, signature, port, or bounded interface value only when its exact admission predicate is satisfied.
“Unscoped glossary.”A glossary episteme carries or lists words without an exact governed value and kind, by-value reference scheme, local sense, and any actually needed Bridge.Use a NameCard for a durable local settlement. Open a public row only through the section 4.4 gate. When availability is current, use an E.24.PUB publication occurrence to make the selected row or glossary edition available through a distinct form and carrier.