F.19:7 - Conformance checklist

These questions guide one connected reading; they do not require separate recorded answers. KindPreservationCheck names the comparison required of every rewrite. Its separate result form is optional under F.19:4.1.

Check	Requirement
`CC-F19-1`	The repair names the text span and visible apparatus candidates before rewriting.
`CC-F19-2`	The repair separates apparatus from content by the values named in `KindAndClaimMap`, `ActionGuidingClaimDetails`, and `FlowPosition`; lexical dislike is not enough. Role- and function-shaped wording remains content until the connected reading or, for an unresolved claim, `E.10.ROLE` or `A.6.F` recovers it.
`CC-F19-3`	Apparatus is removed or moved before wording-use precision restoration is applied to the remaining content.
`CC-F19-4`	Content-bearing wording remains content; when ordinary reading leaves its meaning unresolved, it is repaired by `E.10`, `E.10.ARCH`, `F.18`, or the specific pattern that defines, constrains, or tests the remaining claim rather than deleted as style.
`CC-F19-5`	A removed apparatus word is not replaced by a synonym, metonymy, role label, container word, or status word that carries the same hidden apparatus.
`CC-F19-6`	Established FPF terms are preserved unless a named precision-restoration or naming pattern changes them.
`CC-F19-7`	Every accepted rewrite passes the `KindPreservationCheck` comparison; a change to object kind, relation or claim kind, current slot, relation position, use, scope, or a live action-guiding discriminant without an accepted decision remains a blocker.
`CC-F19-8`	Development, evaluation, projection, landing, use-found, repair, and source-management evidence stay in the evidence, projection, release, or publication loci that carry them unless the text is about that flow object.
`CC-F19-9`	The accepted rewrite is shorter or clearer without losing technical semantics or action-guiding detail. A longer rewrite is admissible only when it recovers a hidden kind, relation, role or assignment distinction, function claim, slot, claim boundary, quantity, threshold, polarity, order, timing, criterion, tolerance, exception, or applicability condition needed by the declared use.
`CC-F19-10`	The repair records any loss of truth, action, stop criterion, value, usability, locality, currentness, kind recoverability, or explicit operational detail used by the declared reader.
`CC-F19-11`	Term-source or type annotation is used only when it changes the object, kind, relation, slot, use, publication boundary, admissible use, or rule the reader must apply; stable ordinary prose is not expanded into type labels.
`CC-F19-12`	The accepted plain rewrite satisfies MG-DA cold-reader recovery under F.19:4’s evidence-selection and coverage conditions: a reader without the `DRR`, campaign notes, or author memory can state the content-bearing object, kind or ordinary status, relation or claim position, admissible use, next practical action, and every quantity, threshold, ordering, timing, criterion, exception, or applicability condition that changes that action. When another pattern contributes, the reader can recover its id and contribution. Broad heads such as `object`, `item`, `value`, `relation`, `record`, `condition`, `basis`, `material`, and unqualified `specialization` are not plain enough when they hide what the practitioner must recognize.
`CC-F19-13`	Every added qualifier or formal identity has a named live contrast: it changes truth, action, stop, migration, publication, reuse, or reliance. An ordinary PatternID citation does not by itself require a `ClaimGraph`, `U.MethodDescription`, `U.Method`, actor, assignment, or `U.Work` expansion.
`CC-F19-14`	After apparatus removal, the sentence names every complement and live discriminant needed to determine what was selected, changed, compared, transformed, published, evaluated, relied on, started, stopped, ordered, limited, or excepted.
`CC-F19-15`	Ordinary practitioner action and instrumental “use pattern X” wording stays ordinary when it does not assert identity-bearing dated Work. When it does, point to the basis: A.13 first, independent A.15.1 Work admission second, and F.6 afterward only for precise assignment-bound attribution. Use one thin `E.10.ROLE` or `A.6.F` route for a role- or function-shaped trigger; do not copy either recovery taxonomy. `U.MethodDescription` appears only after the `A.3.2` test passes.
`CC-F19-16`	A heterogeneous list is split when its members need different heads or predicates; the rewrite uses the coordination-and-list move in F.19:4 instead of inventing one umbrella head, with `E.10:0.2c.17` only for an unresolved FPF kind or relation.
`CC-F19-17`	A negative alternative remains only when it passes F.19:4’s full independent-ground, plausible-reader, contribution, and smallest-clear-correction test. Without that ground and contribution, the sentence states the positive object, relation, action, or result directly. Problem statements, disputes, material polarity, and documented anti-patterns remain content.
`CC-F19-18` Governing message	The intended reader and use are clear, and the governing object, claim, event, action, or distinction appears before optional apparatus.
`CC-F19-19` Semantic completeness	The predicate, required participants or operands, relational-noun complements, and local referents are recoverable without author memory or a reference puzzle.
`CC-F19-20` Predicate and kind fit	Interpret the complete predicate with its negation and modality. Positive assignments are kind-compatible under the intended literal or metonymic reading; a denial of a type mistake passes the grounded-contribution test. Preserve object kind, claim or relation kind, slot, relation position, use, and publication boundary where they change meaning.
`CC-F19-21` Meaning and loss preservation	The rewrite preserves every live term, polarity, quantity, threshold, temporal or ordering condition, criterion, tolerance, exception, applicability boundary, and other action-changing detail. Any accepted change of kind, relation, scope, currentness, or use has its own decision.
`CC-F19-22` Grounded contribution	Every optional guard, contrast, modifier, example, and coordinated member changes recognition, understanding, evidence, decision, safety, stop, reliance, or action for a plausible intended reader. A negative alternative has an independent local ground and is the smallest clear correction.
`CC-F19-23` Coordination and foregrounding	A list states the proposition or action it serves; its kind, predicate, membership semantics, and closure are not fabricated; illustrative status is clear when needed; and coordination or modifiers do not postpone the governing message.
`CC-F19-24` Plain result	A cold intended reader can recover the repaired claim and next useful action under F.19:4’s selected evidence basis and coverage. The ordinary output is repaired text or a blocker, not a mandatory form or ledger.
`CC-F19-25` Local revalidation	Any changed wording or syntax has been reread with only its meaning-dependent neighbours. An older semantic verdict is reused only for unchanged text.